Print Friendly and PDF
Look for hotels with fewer amenities for a less expensive room
New defect found in Takata airbags resulting in 2.7 million additional vehicles being recalled

The public can record police officers, federal court rules

Ois-homeThe recording the police is protected under the First Amendment, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled Monday.

The court said that the ability to record police is importance because it ensures that the public can hold government officials accountable for misconduct.

In 1991, George Holliday recorded video of the Los Angeles Police Department officers beating Rodney King and submitted it to the local news. Filming police on the job was rare then but common now. With advances in technology and the widespread ownership of smartphones, civilian recording of police officers is common. These recordings have both exposed police misconduct and exonerated officers from charges.

However, despite the growing frequency of private citizens recording police activity and its importance to all involved, some jurisdictions have attempted to regulate such recordings. Individuals making recordings have also faced retaliation by officers, such as arrests on false criminal charges and even violence.

The case the court ruled on involved retaliation. Richard Fields and Amanda Geraci attempted to record Philadelphia police officers carrying out official duties in public and were retaliated against even though the Philadelphia Police Department’s official policies recognized that private individuals have a First Amendment right to observe and record police officers engaged in the public discharge of their duties.”

The court said it join the growing consensus, saying “Simply put, the First Amendment protects the act of photographing, filming, or otherwise recording police officers conducting their official duties in public.

“Government operates best in sunlight, and the police are not an exception,” said Reggie Shuford, executive director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, which represented Fields and Geraci with cooperating counsel. “The First Amendment right to document the police at work is critical to promote transparency. We are grateful that the appeals court agrees.” 

Copyright 2017, Rita R. Robison, Consumer Specialist


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)