Print Friendly and PDF
Consider donating to my blog and newsletter on Giving Tuesday
Be sure to check to see if a car you’re planning to buy has a recall issue

Study of internet service providers’ bills shows confusing amounts, high prices, and a lack of competitive prices

Comcast PhotoComcast is one of the companies that I dislike the most. I’m using polite language here because it’s the best thing for bloggers to do. I’ve had poor customer service many, many times, and one customer service manager used abusive language, calling me derogatory names.

Another thing that irks me about Comcast is mandatory fees, such as $20 a month for sports, for items that I don’t want or need.

I wish there were better alternatives in my area for internet service and competitive prices.

In an internet service provider study, Consumer Reports collected data from monthly internet bills sent to and paid by consumers.

Here are some of the findings:

  • Internet pricing can sometimes appear to be arbitrary; in several instances companies charged different prices for exactly the same service plans.
  • Overall, average pre-discount prices for internet service ranged from less than $40 to more than $100 a month. The median price of the 18,359 bills where Consumer Reports could clearly identify internet cost was $74.99.
  • The average internet speeds consumers purchased varied dramatically, most ranging from 10 Mbps up to 1 Gigabit, or roughly 100 times faster.
  • The bills Consumer Reports received show that prices can vary by market, especially when consumers have choice among providers. Americans in markets where Consumer Reports received bills from at least three broadband competitors reported paying, on average, about $5 per month less for service than those in areas where we received bills from one or two providers, and reported prices were lower still as the number of local competitors increased.
  • Many of the bills collected included add-on fees for extra services, such as “unlimited data allowances” or data overage fees with plans that have data caps. There can also be extra charges for equipment such as router or modem rental fees.
  • More than a dozen internet service providers were found to charge company-imposed fees – also known as junk fees – under names such as “network enhancement fee,” “internet infrastructure fee,” “deregulated administration fee,” and “technology service fee.” They can surprise consumers when they appear on monthly bills, and can enable providers to raise prices without seeming to violate marketing or contractual price commitments.

Policymakers and regulators need to address the lack of competition in the marketplace and the tactics providers use to increase profits.

Consumer Reports has long advocated for greater competition and more transparency in the broadband marketplace, said Jonathan Schwantes, senior policy counsel for the organization. It supports the Federal Communication Commission’s ongoing broadband label proceeding, which has a chance to solve many of the problems uncovered by Consumer Reports’ research, Schwantes said.

A broadband label would clearly present pricing information, any additional fees (for example, device rental fees), promotional discounts and length, and performance information (for example, expected download and upload speeds).

Consumer Reports also is urging Congress to pass two bills – the Community Broadband Act and the Uncap America Act.

The broadband act would boost competition by helping cities provide low-cost municipal broadband service to compete with the biggest providers, and make sure providers don’t game the system to keep competitors out of their markets. The uncap act would require that data caps be used only for network management purposes, and direct the FCC to prohibit data caps in the fixed broadband market where they can’t be technically justified.

Consumer Reports launched the Fight for Fair Internet project in 2021 with dozens of partner organizations to collect and analyze consumer internet bills.

It analyzed more than 22,000 bills from 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The bills included more than 500 separate internet service providers and different types of internet service, such as coaxial cable, fiber optic, satellite, fixed wireless, and DSL. 

Earlier research looked at data from publicly available sources such as internet service provider websites.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Lack of competition AND lack of regulation, and effective enforcement of regulations. FCC does nothing, file a complaint all that happens is the FCC sends a copy of your complaint to the internet provider who says, gee whiz, did that happen, well we're sure that we're providing first class service. And that's that. Nothing changes. US gov't makes very little effort to protect consumers by regulating, truly regulating, utilities like internet providers (who may also provide cell service and/or landline service). My state's consumer protection dept (a division or dept within the state DOJ) was pretty good 25 years ago, now it's fill out a form, completed complaint for is sent to ISP, see above for usual ISP response. End of state action. Because it's more important to provide incentives & subsidies (via tax breaks or direct payments) to very large and small businesses, then to have enough to fund consumer protection divisions or agencies well enough that they can respond more effectively to consumer complaints. Be nice if the FCC or other federal agency outlawed--w/a monetary fine and provision for plaintiff's attorney fees (ie,. if a customer sued) for violation of regulations that outlaw "fake" charges. If states and the federal gov't can't "afford" to actively regulate utilities, then time to make it possible for non-wealthy "consumers" or individual customers to sue to enforce existing and better/stricter regulations by making it possible to have attorney fees paid (by the utility). So individuals can enforce regulations themselves.


The FCC does more than the FTC. The FCC will send a copy of your complaint to the company. The FTC doesn't even do that. The FTC just files complaints, and if the file gets big, it considers legal action.

State attorneys general also send your complaint to the company you're complaining about. Again, they don't do anything until the file gets big.

Much stronger regulations are needed for internet service providers and other companies, too. Laws get watered down in Congress because there is so, so much lobbying by corporations of all kinds.

Good idea. Have attorney fees paid for consumers suing companies for wrongdoing.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)